Here's Hoping Common Core Keeps Its Novel Edge

An award-winning principal who wrote a book all about the positives of Common Core is beginning to have second thoughts. It appears that some districts and/or states apparently view Common Core in much the same way as No Child Left Behind. It's a complete shame. Common Core promises invigorating classrooms where students delve into real-world projects that encourage them to use all their academic skills to solve the project. This is so like the model John Dewey advocated 50 years ago, and is much the reason I entered education. So now this worries me -- within a one or two-year turn around, can our states truly accept Common Core for all the excitement and dynamic learning it can provide? Exactly how will your state/district translate Common Core for your child? After all, isn't a riveting classroom the best one to learn in?

Brain-Based Learning --- How Amazing It All Is

Okay, the title I gave this post is really for me. I had heard of brain-based learning a good 15 years ago, and just figured it was another "pop" reading intervention that would soon fade. What I did not know was brain-based learning was based on the fMRIs, new to the field of learning in those days but oh! what it allowed researchers to do. My own stupidity and loss -- I didn't try to educate myself on the work, so now, 15 years later, I came across two books on the topic and became mesmerized. Maryanne Wolfe's Proust and the Squid, a professor from Tufts, takes an educational view toward the field; I found her book enthralling, with detailed research that answered so much. Stanislas Dehaeine's Reading In the Brain is more science-based, but even as I floundered on some of his explanations, I was just as riveted to his words.

It's been 8 months since I read both of these books so I am at a loss to intelligently summarize both books without harming them. When I have reread them - and I am itching to -- I will again post and this time talk about them in detail. I used both books in giving a presentation to parents at my school months ago, and follow-up comments from them was extremely positive. I worried I had overburdened them with studies and facts.  Instead, "We want more," was the comment I got.

Want to Get Your Kids Reading? Take Her To See the Authors

The biggest known secret around is this -- if you want to get your child reading, help her school bring in a (good!) author. There's something magical about putting a face to a book, to hear the author tell how he developed the idea for the book, that ignites the students listening to want to read his book. And then his next book, and other books...

Now bringing in some of the major authors can cost big bucks -- you have to foot the bill of the airfare, the lodgings, and, of course, the honorarium. But many cities have excellent children's authors right in their midsts. You also might be able to work together with a local bookstore or book event that is already bringing in an author.

Just be sure to screen the books of any author you select. Some, although calling themselves "children's authors," are not. And some other authors really don't write well. (It often depends who published their book. And if they are self-published, how much screening their books went through. The best way to determine quality is simply to read the book(s) yourself.)

Or if bringing in an author doesn't work for you, check around and see if any are coming to your town soon. Your child will love seeing an author of a book they admire. They will.

Teaching Religion In Public Schools

I ran across an article about how some states are trying to integrate discussions (and practices) of various religious groups into their instruction. It is a difficult venture, one that I've seen in many schools in Texas, Kansas, and Missouri. Some  teachers lead their classes in excellent, open discussions about religions that aren't their own. Other teachers can't -- they have their own strong religious beliefs, and to give equal validity to another religion -- especially ones they don't agree with -- is more than they can overcome. And it shows.

An aside: When I first came to Kansas, I taught in a small, rural, 4-classroom/8-grade level elementary school. When I heard we'd be having religion class in the middle of the day, I was enthused and told the nuns who came by to visit all about how I had divided my social studies classroom last year in Texas into six groups, with each group studying one major world religion. The nuns didn't say a word.

I was new to the school. Their religion class was taught to the Catholic children in my classroom; any non-Catholics (I had one Protestant) could remain in the classroom with me during that time. (This is how public education is tweaked in some rural settings, I came to learn.) I don't know what that one boy and I did during that time, but I do remember it wasn't religion. Maybe an extra art time?